ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to compare the sensitivity and specificity of three diagnostic tools for delirium (the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist, the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units and the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet) in a mixed population of critically ill patients, and to validate the Brazilian Portuguese Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units. METHODS: The study was conducted in four intensive care units in Brazil. Patients were screened for delirium by a psychiatrist or neurologist using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Patients were subsequently screened by an intensivist using Portuguese translations of the three tools. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients were evaluated and 38.6 percent were diagnosed with delirium by the reference rater. The Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units had a sensitivity of 72.5 percent and a specificity of 96.2 percent; the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet had a sensitivity of 72.5 percent and a specificity of 96.2 percent; the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist had a sensitivity of 96.0 percent and a specificity of 72.4 percent. There was strong agreement between the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units and the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet (kappa coefficient = 0.96) CONCLUSION: All three instruments are effective diagnostic tools in critically ill intensive care unit patients. In addition, the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of delirium among critically ill patients.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Delirium/diagnosis , Intensive Care Units , Mass Screening/adverse effects , Translations , Brazil , Critical Illness , Delirium/epidemiology , Language , Mass Screening/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Analisar a confiabilidade de um questionário auto-aplicável sobre o uso e abuso de substâncias entre adolescentes escolares. MÉTODOS: Foram realizados dois estudos transversais para teste e re-teste do questionário em amostra representativa de alunos de ambos os sexos, de 11 a 19 anos, de escolas públicas e privadas (do curso fundamental e médio) de Salvador, BA, em 2006. Foram aplicados 591 questionários na primeira aplicação e 467 na segunda. Foram calculados a estatística descritiva, o índice kappa, alfa de Cronbach e correlação intraclasse. RESULTADOS: A prevalência do uso/abuso das substâncias foi semelhante em ambas as avaliações. Para as variáveis sociodemográficas o índice kappa indicou concordância "moderada" a "quase perfeita" e a análise do alfa de Cronbach e correlação intraclasse indicaram consistência "satisfatória". A idade de experimentação das substâncias psicoativas (tabaco, álcool e maconha) e idade dos estudantes foram semelhantes nas duas avaliações. A idade de iniciação do consumo e padrões de uso foram considerados indicadores confiáveis. CONCLUSÕES: A confiabilidade do questionário foi satisfatória para a população estudada.